Gender And Turn Taking in Mata Najwa Talk Show: A Conversation Analysis

  • Salma Azzahidah Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Evynurul Laily Zen Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Evi Eliyanah Universitas Negeri Malang
Abstract views: 199 , PDF downloads: 268
Keywords: Turn-taking; gender; television Indonesia; conversation analysis


This study aims to examine the turn-taking strategy for the same gender and mixed gender that occurred in the Mata Najwa Talk show, as well as to find out the gender pattern that is formed in Indonesia. The data were analyzed using the Have theory (2007) for the turn-taking strategy and Setiawan (2013) for gender patterns that occur in Indonesia. The findings demonstrate that: (1) In the same gender conversation, domination by certain party is rarely found. However, women when talking to their fellow women tend to use more turn-taking strategies in a conversation such as speak then ask, phrases of agreeing and disagreeing, phrases for asking for/giving opinions, and fillers of pauses. Meanwhile, when men talk to other men, the greatest value occurs in the phrase for asking for/giving opinions strategy. (2) In mixed gender conversation, it was found that when women talk to men, men are likely to dominate the conversation. Najwa Shihab as the presenter got less number of turn-taking than men in the strategy of using conjunctions, phrases of agreeing and disagreeing, and phrases for asking for/giving opinions. (3) This research also shows a pattern that occurs in Indonesia, which in this pattern shows that men tend to dominate when talking to women, and this rooted in the dominant gender construction in Indonesia.


Download data is not yet available.


Azhar, K A., & Iqbal, N. (2019). Turn-taking and gender differences in language classroom.
Journal of NELTA, 23(1-2). 54-67.
Bosch, L T. (2004). Turn-taking in social talk dialogues: Temporal, formal, and functional aspects. ISCA Archieve. taking_in_social_talk_dialogues_temporal_formal_and_functional_aspects
Chalak, A & Karimi, M. (2017). Analysis of turn taking and repair strategies among male and female iranian intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 1-9.
Coates, J. (2013). Conversational dominance in mixed talk, Woman, Man and Language (pp. 112- 114). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gay, T. (2012). A short of turn taking in mixed sex, small group discussion. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 2(2), 125-142.
Grubb, C. (2016). Power dynamics in conversation. Honors Paper. In: Digital Commons at Oberlin.
Gusmansyah, W. (2019). Dinamika kesetaraan gender dalam kehidupan politik di Indonesia.
Jurnal Hawa, 1(1), 156-172.
Han, N V. (2014). The relation between language and gender: a case study in vietnamese. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3(3), 96-99. a-case-study-in-vietnamese-2923.html
Have, P T. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
Hussein, A M. (2020). Turn-taking and gender dominance issue. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(2), 172-177.
Lerner, G H. (2004). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(9), 1532-1535.
Levinson, S C. (2015). Turn-taking in human communication – Origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 6-14.
Marhumah. (2011). Konstruksi gender, hegemoni kekuasaan, dan Lembaga Pendidikan. KARSA, 19(2), 168-182.
Naglaa, M. A. (2006). Turn Taking Behavior and Gender Differences in Speech: A Case of a Group of Educated Sudanese (Master’s Thesis, University of Khartoum). Retrieved from

Prakasa, S. J. (2015). Komunikasi dan gender: Perbandingan gaya komunikasi dalam budaya maskulin dan feminim. Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi, 5(1), 19-30.
Preece, S. (2011). Language and gender. In P. Pichler (Ed.), Language Society & Power: An introduction (pp. 103-107). New York, NY: Routledge.
Putri, E Y. (2017). Language and gender: A conversation analysis in the difference of language related to gender. Proceedings of the Fifth ISELT-5, 5, 21-26.
Royaldi, D., Susiana, N., and Khumaida, F A. (2019). Effectiveness management of qualitative research in writing scientific papers. ATM, 3 (1), 84-90. qualitative-cda131a4.pdf
Sakina, A. I. (2017). Menyoroti budaya patriarki di Indonesia. Social work journal. 7(1), 71-80.
Schegloff, E A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation.
Language in Society, 29(1), 1-63.
Setiawan, I. (2013). Analisis percakapan Bahasa Sasak dalam perspektif gender: Sebuah wacana kritis. Mabasan, 7(1), 24-35.
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2013). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford, OX: Blackwell Publishing.
Stokoe, E H. (2001). Making gender relevant: conversation analysis and gender categories in interactions. Discourse & Society, 12(2), 243-269.
Suhapti, R. (2016). Gender dan permasalahannya. Buletin psikologi, 3(1), 44-52.
Turner, L. H. (2015). An investigation of female/male verbal behaviors in same-sex and mixed- sex conversation. Communication Reports, 8(2), 86-96.
Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford, OX: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Weatherall, A (2002) gender, language, conversation analysis and feminism. Discourse & Society, 13(6), 707-713.
Wiasti, N M. (2017). Mencermati permasalahan gender dan pengarusutamaan gender (PUG). Sunari Penjor, 1(1), 29-42.
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: a comparative and critical introduction. London: SAGE Publications.

Zhao, F. (2010). An analysis of gender differences in interruption based on the tv series Friends. Sociology. in-Interruption-Zhao/953580f0120a6ac88da488c8a45936e1bdf7ead0#citing-papers
Zulkarnain, S. I. (2018). Perbedaan gaya bahasa laki-laki dan perempuan pada penutur Bahasa Indonesia dan Aceh. International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, 4(1), 159-172.
How to Cite
Salma Azzahidah, Evynurul Laily Zen, & Evi Eliyanah. (2023). Gender And Turn Taking in Mata Najwa Talk Show: A Conversation Analysis. LINGUA : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 20(1), 32-54.