ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN A SPEAKING CLASS

  • Imroatus Solikhah IAIN Surakarta
https://doi.org/10.30957/lingua.v13i1.14
Abstract views: 853 , PDF downloads: 1066
Keywords: corrective feedback, classroom based research

Abstract

The objective of this study is to see kinds of corrective feedbacks used by English lecturer in speaking class.  The study used classroom based observation  as the design, assigning 30 students and one speaking lecturer in English department University of Bantara (UNIVET) Sukoharjo.  Data were collected using observation and interview.  The study revealed that teacher’s corrective feedback is one factor that influences the progress of students in learning English. It did not bother the students in building a communication. The evidence showed that that the teacher applied recasts, explicit correction, and clarification requests. Recasts was dominated the type of corrective feedback used by the teacher because it did not make the students confused. Three criteria of effective corrective feedback occurred in correction given by the teacher. He was consistent in treating the errors, gave correction without breaking the flow of the communication, and did not ridicule the students in giving correction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2016-04-03
How to Cite
Solikhah, I. (2016). ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN A SPEAKING CLASS . LINGUA : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 13(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.30957/lingua.v13i1.14
Issue
Vol. 13 No. 1 (2016): Maret 2016
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).